The Confederacy Revisited Well, here I am back again! I
didn't stay away for long, did I? I am back only to remedy an omission,
however. I feel I should mention that I received a HEAP of emails about
my comments on America's North/South war. My comment was that from my
perch in faraway Australia, it looked to me like the war was about
power, not slaves. Cynical old me!
Only one of the emails I
received disagreed with me. The rest were supportive and some were --
Ahem! -- decidedly robust -- suggesting that Lincoln differed from
Hitler only in that Lincoln was the bigger hypocrite etc., etc. A lot
of people really gagged on that "malice towards none" in the Second
Inaugural address. So I feel that I should post here at least one of
the emails I received. The one below seems short and sharp and to the
point:
"Actually, "The War for Southern
Independence" was started when the Southern Territories seceded from
the Union over unfair taxation policies. Slavery was not really brought
into play until Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation which freed
slaves ONLY in the Southern regions he no longer had legal control
over. This was done to gain the support of blacks both free and
enslaved. Lincoln was the first President to never have owned slaves,
only because his family was too poor, but he was openly segregationist.
If you look into the history, not the basic BS taught in public
schools, the Northern states received almost all of the slave ships.
Also compare the dates that the Northern States abolished slavery".
I
stress that I am NO expert on American history and you could fill a
whole library with books that have been written about the war so I
acknowledge that any generalization about it is bound to have its
problems. I do however note that EVERY other country in the world (as
far as I know) freed its slaves WITHOUT a war. So that suggests to me
that the American war was about a lot more than slaves.
What I
think that truly sensitive people (as distinct from pseudo-sensitive
Leftists) might do well always to be aware of, however, is the depth of
feeling that the war still evokes among many Southerners. And that
feeling is not going to go away soon. Go to Yorkshire in England and
ask the typical Yorkshireman what he thinks of Lancastrians. You will
get an earful. And THAT goes back to the Wars of the Roses, which ended
around 500 years ago. It almost helps you to understand the Irish! (And
I have got a lot of Irish in me -- of which I am proud -- so I can say
that!).
I am still getting lots of good-humored email from
people who are proud to be called all sorts of names as grandparents
and quite a few people have had fun with my suggestion that sporting
teams might have to be named after flowers in the future. A couple of
people have pointed out that "Gladioli" would be no good as a team name
because the word is derived from "Gladius", the word for a sword in
ancient Rome!