"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press"
The primary site for this blog mirror is HERE. Dissecting Leftism is HERE (and mirrored here). The Blogroll. My Home Page. Email me (John Ray) here. (Click "Refresh" on your browser if background colour is missing) See here or here for the archive index of this site
****************************************************************************************
31 August, 2014
Budget supermarket chain bans kids' book
So, Aldi has banned the Roald Dahl kids' classic Revolting Rhymes over a word.
The word at issue – and it pains me to assault your ears, dear reader, with such unpleasantness but assault I must – is "slut".
It was withdrawn, apparently, after "comments by a limited number of
concerned customers", which appears to mean a single post on the
supermarket's Facebook page.
"There is an unacceptable word in it for kids!!! Not OK!" fumed the outraged (and over-punctuated) customer.
Since when did Aldi sell books, anyway? I always thought it was that
place you went to buy baked beans and come home instead with a new golf
bag and some off-brand breakfast cereal the kids refuse to eat.
But now apparently it's a bookstore, too. And a laughably and stupidly
prudish one at that.
Dahl is routinely described as "much-loved" largely because he is ...
much loved. And the reason his books like Charlie And The Chocolate
Factory, James And The Giant Peach and The Twits are so popular is
because he is so totally unsentimental. People – especially adults –
behave very badly in Dahl's books and characters routinely come to a
sticky end (in Augustus Gloop's case, literally). The stories are
gloriously gruesome and violent ... and kids adore them because they
don't feel patronised.
Dahl's work also demonstrate his fierce intelligence and his passion for
language, which brings us to the word slut, which has been excised lest
it provoke uproar among the baked bean shoppers of Aldi.
The couplet in Dahl's re-working of Cinderella reads: "The Prince cried,
'Who's this dirty slut?/ Off with her nut! Off with her nut!"
Fully accepting that words can and do change their meaning over time (cf
"gay") it's nevertheless clear Dahl is using the word here in its
original sense, "a dirty, slovenly woman", according to the Macquarie
Dictionary.
One of the earliest recorded usage of the word is in Chaucer's
Canterbury Tales, a work which presumably also has no chance of making
it on to Aldi's shelves.
A few kids books have so far escaped the eagle eye of the supermarket
censors. How long they might last before someone complains, however, is
anybody's gues
SOURCE
"Doctor Who" criticised for scene in which characters tear out their hair after complaints from sufferers of rare disorder
No matter what you do, it seems you will "offend" someone
Doctor Who has come under fire after a scene featuring stars Peter
Capaldi and Jenna Coleman pulling out their hair sparked complaints from
sufferers of a rare disorder.
The BBC sci-fi show has been branded 'insensitive' following a scene
which left sufferers of trichotillomania 'upset' and 'uncomfortable'.
Around 36 minutes in, the Doctor, who at the time was seen to be in an
intense conversation with Clara Oswald (Ms Coleman), appears to begin to
pull his hair out before then pulling out the hair of his
co-star. After pulling her hair out he remarks to Clara 'it was
the only one out of place, I am sure you would have wanted it killed'.
Quickly after the short scene finished, sufferers of trichotillomania
and Dr Who fans took to social media to slam the BBC for showing the
scene which could be seen as a trigger to some people.
Trichotillomania is an uncommon way of harming where the inflictor pulls
their hair out. It’s classed as an obsessive compulsive
disorder and can affect anyone. Unfortunately there is still no known
cure for the life-long disorder.
SOURCE
29 August, 2014
Australia: Apartheid Billboard -- "Wrong in South Africa. Wrong in Palestine" -- taken down
Libel has never had free speech protections and the message on
the billboard is an egregious lie -- grossly defamatory to Israel and
Israelis
The Free Palestine billboard that was taken down last week from its City
Road, Southbank [Melbourne] position by oOh! Media pending a
determination, will not be put back.
The Chief Operating Officer of oOh! Media said that his company had
decided the Apartheid message – Wrong in South Africa. Wrong in
Palestine. was political and that it was within its rights to terminate
the contract with Australians for Palestine. He also advised
that the Advertising Standards Board would not be making a ruling.
While clause 10.1 does allow for termination of the contract, the
required seven (7) days written notice was never given. Instead
the billboard was arbitrarily taken down within 48 hours. The
company claimed that it had made its decision after considering the
unprecedented number of complaints.
Ms Samah Sabawi speaking on behalf of Australians for Palestine said
“that this action contravenes the rights to freedom of opinion and
expression as set out in articles 19 and 20 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to which Australia is
party.”
SOURCE
Must not mention the oppression of Muslim women
"He could be funny anywhere. We were such close friends," Billy Crystal
said of Robin Williams in a special tribute to the comedian aired midway
through the Emmy Awards ceremony in Los Angeles last night
"While some of the brightest of our celestial bodies are actually
extinct now, their energy long since cooled, but miraculously, because
they float in the heavens so far away from us now, their beautiful light
will continue to shine on us forever.
"And the glow will be so bright it will warm your heart and will
make your eyes glisten and you will think to yourselves, 'Robin
Williams. What a concept.'"
And for the most part, the audience at home and in the Nokia Theatre crowd appeared visibly moved by the segment.
That is until the honour ended in a series of clips of the comedian in
action, cracking jokes during televised interviews and in stand-up.
In particular, it included a short snippet of a stand-up performance
during which Williams borrows a pink scarf from an audience member in
the front row and wraps its round his head to simulate a Hijab, or
Islamic headscarf.
"I would like to welcome you to Iran… Help me!" he cries.
Viewers participating over Twitter were quick to criticise the inclusion of the joke as "racist":
SOURCE
28 August, 2014
Must not disparage the Taliban (!)
The writer is a member of UKIP, an increasingly influential British conservative party
Over the weekend I came across a spoof picture of a Taliban Online
Dating Website with profiles of burka-clad women listed as: Occupation:
Not Allowed; Income: Not Allowed; and Hobbies: Not Allowed, I re-tweeted
it saying humour can be a most expressive form of critical comment.
To my shock, a torrent of abuse landed in my Twitter feed. Despite the
picture being beyond any doubt a pop at the Taliban - and only the
Taliban - the UKIP-haters still did their worst. By the end of the day
I’d been labelled a ‘truly sickening racist,’ ‘openly racist,’ ‘sexist,’
‘xenophobic,’ ‘Islamophobic,’ ‘vile,’ and a ‘lout.’ And that’s just the
stuff I can publish here.
When I tweeted back, expressing astonishment anyone could think I was
bigoted because I slated the Taliban and suggested one particularly
vituperative correspondent might struggle to defend his claims in court,
I was accused of ‘harassment,’ ‘thuggery’ and being a ‘bully.’ A few
then started copying journalists not known for their love of UKIP into
their tweets. You really couldn’t make it up.
Presumably these agitators generally consider themselves to be the very
epitome of feminist, free speech-loving liberalism. They probably even
complain on occasion that there aren’t enough women in politics – oh the
irony!
Yet in their bloodlust for seeing someone, anyone, in UKIP humiliated
they effectively defended one of the world’s most despicable political
organisations, one that wouldn’t hesitate to execute a teacher who
taught a girls to read and write, or slaughter a gay man on sight.
But of course, that doesn’t matter; because for the anti-UKIP internet
‘liberals’ who hide behind false profiles and fake photos and scream
‘intolerance’ while hurling abuse and trying to ‘expose’ you to all and
sundry, this isn’t about right or wrong, or it’s about perpetuating a
political witch-hunt. That and completely muddle-headed thinking.
SOURCE
Hate speech against tea partiers from Karl Marx avatar
All assertion. No supporting evidence
In an op-ed published on Tuesday, an Illinois State University professor
made numerous baseless accusations leveraged at the good people of the
Tea Party. Steve Hochstadt stated:
“Tea party politicians don’t like people who are out
of work. In Congress and in campaigns they consistently oppose paying
unemployment insurance to the most distressed citizens, those who have
been out of work for the longest time.”
In reality, members of the Tea Party don’t want to pay for the bottom
feeders of society to sit on their rear ends all day while the rest of
us foot the bill. But Hochstadt doesn’t have time for all that logic. He
went on to say:
“They don’t like immigrants. Most of those who
identify with the tea party want to deport all undocumented immigrants.
But tea party supporters don’t like immigrants in general: Over half
think that ‘immigrants’ take away jobs from ‘Americans.”
Then, Hochstadt went on to call all members of the Tea Party racist. Of
course, he has no evidence to back any of these claims up. Liberals
don’t like to get tied up with pesky evidence. Hochstadt ranted:
“[Tea partiers harbor] generally negative beliefs
about African-Americans. They do not believe that all men have
inalienable rights. Only they have the right to say what is right. They
don’t want to govern, they want to dictate. They don’t like most
Americans, who don’t agree with their ideas. They probably don’t like
you. They are intolerant and dangerous.”
Ironically, Hochstadt is a history professor at ISU. If he knew a thing
or two, he’d realize that it’s the Democrats who have historically been,
‘racist, intolerant and dangerous’. [Google "klanbake" if you
doubt it]
SOURCE
27 August, 2014
Racist slur backfires
Olivia Chow is a prominent Leftist in Canadian politics who is at
present running for Mayor of Toronto. A senior member of her
campaign team made an egregious accusation of racism about one of Ms
Chow's opponents. That was widely seen as offensive and
unwarranted
Ever since Warren Kinsella, an outspoken Liberal strategist who is head
of Ms. Chow’s rapid-response “war room,” incited controversy this week
by accusing rival John Tory of having a “segregationist” transit plan,
Ms. Chow has attempted to play down his role on her campaign. In recent
days, Mr. Kinsella appears to have deleted more than 40 blog posts he’s
written in support of Ms. Chow, dating back to at least November of last
year -- later writing on his blog that he still supports her, but is
trying to be "positive".
SOURCE
British soccer official in trouble over things he said in private emails
Iain Moody has resigned as Crystal Palace's sporting director after
Sportsmail revealed that he exchanged a series of shocking text messages
with then Cardiff City boss Malky Mackay.
Mackay and Moody have been reported to the FA and accused of being
racist, sexist and homophobic after the alleged recovery of around
70,000 texts and 100,000 emails.
These messages came to light after a dawn raid on Moody’s south London
home in March this year, as part of Cardiff’s £750,000 investigation
into eight controversial transfers.
The letters to the FA make reference to the following alleged offensive communications between Moody, Mackay and others:
In July 2012, Cardiff signed South Korean
international Kim Bo-kyung, but when Moody informed Mackay on July 12
that ‘five of the b******s including the player’ were arriving for
talks, the reply from Mackay’s phone was: ‘Fkn chinkys.’ A further
message says: ‘Fk it. There’s enough dogs in Cardiff for us all to go
around.’
In reference to the prominent football agent, Phil
Smith, a text states: ‘Go on, fat Phil. Nothing like a Jew that sees
money slipping through his fingers’. The Israeli club, Maccabi Tel Aviv,
are also referred to simply as ‘the Jews’.
A football official at another club is referred to as
‘a gay snake’ and ‘the homo’ and someone who is ‘not to be trusted’,
while a French player is someone ‘who struck me as an independently
minded young homo’.
In a separate exchange a picture entitled ‘Black
Monopoly’ is sent, with every square a ‘Go To Jail’ square. Of one
African player, it is stated: ‘Doesn’t look like a good cv. And he’s
Nigerian.’
SOURCE
26 August, 2014
Harry Reid Tells Some Asian "Jokes"
Sen. Harry Reid is continuing his odd habit of providing racial
commentaries. It seems that Asians were the next demographic on his
list, where his speech to the Las Vegas Asian Chamber of Commerce
included some awkward jokes about Asian-Americans:
"I don’t think you’re smarter than anybody else, but you’ve convinced a
lot of us you are,” Reid, a Nevada Democrat, told the guffawing crowd at
the Las Vegas Asian Chamber of Commerce. Video of the remarks was
recorded by the Republican opposition research group American Rising.
Later, before walking off stage, Reid quipped: “One problem that I’ve had today is keeping my Wongs straight.”
The group decided against backing the Reid-endorsed Democratic candidate
for Lieutenant Governor, Lucy Flores, supporting Republican Mark
Hutchison instead, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reports.
SOURCE
Amazing what you can say if you are a liberal
Black basketball player Calls Rev. Al Sharpton A 'Coon'
Gilbert Arenas uncorked a racial slur on Reverend Al Sharpton ...
attacking him over his reaction to the police shooting of Michael Brown
and the riots that have followed. Arenas posted his rant on Instagram,
saying ... "the stats also show AL coon Sharpton has not helped one
situation he has protested at,he actually made it worst and because of
him the jury goes the other way." Gilbert appeared to be reacting to
news coverage of Sharpton arriving in the St. Louis area and marching
arm-in-arm with protesters. As if the racial slur wasn't enough, Arenas
added, "#AL ur like a #THOT in the club, lookn for attention. What u
said at trayvons rally #enoughisenough ur right were tired of u
PRETENDING." Sharpton hasn't responded. Yet.
SOURCE
Amazing what you can say if you have a dark skin
25 August, 2014
College Newspaper Changes Name, Says 'The Bullet' 'Propagated Violence'
The usual Leftist gun phobia
Located in Fredericksburg, Virginia -- a place where the Civil War once
raged -- Mary Washington University's student newspaper has been known
as The Bullet since 1922. But not any more.
Pending final approval by the university, the newspaper will now be
called "The Blue & Gray Press," a change intended to "really be
reflective of the student body," the Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star
quoted Editor-in-Chief Alison Thoet as saying.
"The editorial board felt that the paper’s name, which alludes to
ammunition for an artillery weapon, propagated violence and did not
honor our school’s history in a sensitive manner,” said a news release
announcing the change. “The board intends to remain faithful to the
history our university stands upon, and we continue to honor this
history both in a respectful and meaningful way.”
The new name reflects the college's colors. The Mary Washington yearbook
is still called "The Battlefield." Mary Washington is a public
liberal arts school with an enrollment of 4,000 undergraduates.
SOURCE
'Taylor Swift may be boring but she's not a racist': Critics rubbish
claims that singer's new twerking video 'perpetuates black stereotypes'
Critics have rubbished claims that Taylor Swift's latest music video, Shake It Off, 'perpetuates black stereotypes.'
After the singles release on Monday, two members of the California
hip-hop collective Odd Future branded the 24-year-old singer 'racist'
with her attempts at break dancing and twerking.
However, now several members of the black community have weighed in on the debate and come to Miss Swift's defense.
Everdeen Mason, a writer and SEO for the fashion website, Refinery 29,
wrote in an article titled Taylor Swift's "Twerking" Is Not Racist, how
she can’t help but 'feel sorry' for the star.
Ms Mason continues: 'Swift may be many things - boring, overly twee, and
an opportunist who capitalizes on her "approachability" - but she’s
probably not a racist.'
Meanwhile, an anonymous commenter for the tumblr account orhgasm.com
says that as a 'proud black man' he doesn't find the video 'problematic
or even close to racist.'
He adds: 'If you bothered to watch the video, the video was about being
happy and dancing and celebrating other people’s dancing. One of them
happened to include twerking.
'Taylor was not “cultural appropriating” anything and she wasn’t “being
racist” by only having black woman in that part of the video.
'She was celebrating people’s dancing and how they celebrate music
throughout the video and a large variety of black woman twerk. Would it
honestly make sense if Taylor had 100 or so white girls try to twerk?
SOURCE
Twerking seems to consist mainly of pointing your bottom at the audience
so why that is even seen as entertaining rather escapes me. It
must communicate something I guess. Lack of good taste?
24 August, 2014
Student reportedly suspended after saying 'Bless you'
DYER COUNTY, TN - A young girl, who claims she was standing up for her
religious beliefs in the classroom, was suspended after breaking a class
rule of saying "bless you" after a classmate sneezed.
When Dyer County High School senior Kendra Turner said bless you to her
classmate, she says her teacher told her that was for church.
"She said that we're not going to have godly speaking in her class and
that's when I said we have a constitutional right," said Turner.
Turner says when she defended her actions, she was told to see an
administrator. She says she finished the class period in in-school
suspension.
Students sent WMC Action News 5's Michael Clark a photo of the teacher's
white board that lists 'bless you' and other expressions that are
banned as part of class rules.
Turner's family met with school leaders Tuesday. They say the teacher
claimed Turner was being disruptive and aggressive. Some classmates
showed support Tuesday by wearing hand made bless you shirts.
Turner said she doesn't want trouble for her teacher but says she'll
stand up for her faith. "It's alright to defend God and it's
our constitutional right because we have a freedom of religion and
freedom of speech," said Turner.
SOURCE
Ireland: Tyrone footballer Tommy McGuigan saw no problem in recently tweeting that we should assault Jews
Showing the kind of keen political understanding that we have come to
know and expect of our Norn Iron [Northern Ireland] brethren, McGuigan -
a former All-Ireland winner, lest we forget, felt no qualms about
expressing his distaste for the situation in Gaza by encouraging his
followers to randomly attack Jews on the street or in the workplace.
That is appalling enough in itself. But what has been remarkably
depressing, although not very surprising, is the silence of the usual
mob of poltroons who are so quick to hop on any perceived slight or
threat against one of their pet ethnicities.
But Jews are not a pet ethnicity, you see, and they never have been, so
therefore McGuigan isn't a racist, bigoted scumbag. No, he is merely
expressing his horror at a situation he obviously knows absolutely
nothing about.
The difference between actual freedom of speech and literal incitement
to violence is very clear. You are perfectly entitled to express your
contempt for a particular group or culture if you want. After all, that
means you have to defend your position.
But when you start encouraging people to attack members of that group,
you've crossed a line and entered the realm of violent rabble rousing.
The reason why so many of the Irish Left squeal so loudly when accused
of anti-Semitism is because they know, deep down, that even if they
aren't anti-Semitic themselves, there are plenty in their ranks.
SOURCE
22 August, 2014
British far-Leftist lashes out at 'despicable' police probe into his declaration that Bradford was an 'Israel free zone'
It's a wonder he hasn't been prosecuted under Britain's hate speech
laws -- but being a well-known politician probably protects him
Controversial MP George Galloway today vowed not to be 'silenced' after
he was interviewed under caution by police for publicly declaring
Bradford an ‘Israel-free zone’ in protest at the war in Gaza.
Speaking in Leeds earlier this month, the veteran Left-wing firebrand
said Israelis were no longer welcome in the city where he has a
constituency. The remarks sparked outrage and hundreds of complaints to
West Yorkshire Police.
Mr Galloway today lashed out at the police's decision to question him over the speech.
He said: 'This is an absolute and despicable attempt to curb my freedom
of speech by people who appear to be quite happy about the
indiscriminate murder of Palestinians in Gaza.'
Mr Galloway added: 'I won't be silenced, I will keep speaking out against horrendous injustice.'
The police probe was sparked after Mr Galloway made a speech in Leeds in
front of a Palestinian flag, lashing out at Israel's policies in Gaza.
In one part of his speech, Mr Galloway said: ‘We have declared Bradford an Israel-free zone.
‘We don’t want any Israeli goods. We don’t want any Israeli services. We
don’t want any Israeli academics coming to the university or college.
‘We don’t even want any Israeli tourists to come to Bradford even if any of them had thought of doing so.
‘We reject this illegal, barbarous, savage state that calls itself Israel. And you have to do the same.’
The row escalated on Monday after Daniel Taub, Israel's ambassador to
the UK, visited Bradford and held meetings with local Jews and prominent
councillors.
During his visit Mr Taub said: 'In the best spirit of Yorkshire, the
real voice of Bradford knows that there has only ever been one good
boycott – and that's Geoff Boycott.' [A famous Yorkshire cricketer]
SOURCE
Old-fashioned slang for homosexuals lands Australian regional politician in trouble
The Northern Territory’s Deputy Chief Minister Dave Tollner is in
trouble after being heard calling the gay son of fellow Country Liberals
Party politician Gary Higgins a “pillow biter” and “shirt lifter.”
The incident happened during a row over the content of a draft speech,
reports the NT News. It may have serious fall-out, with Higgins
reportedly telling the parliamentary wing that he would boycott all
party meetings while Tollner remained in a leadership position.
Tollner has apologised to Higgins’ son for the comments, which have also
been condemned by Chief Minister Adam Giles as “inappropriate” and “not
acceptable.”
SOURCE
The Northern Territory is something of a Wild West in Australia so political incorrectness is common there
21 August, 2014
Must not be sarcastic about black looters
The following three-paragraph comment was considered to be so offensive that it is now hidden behind a disclaimer screen
The story goes, Michael Brown was doing hood rat shit with his friends,
walking down the middle of the street. The officers warned him to get on
the sidewalk, Michael refused. Here is where the story gets bizarre, he
was shot 25 or 35 (I forget) feet away from the Officer, yet the
Officer claimed there was a struggle for his gun. Not sure if this is
like the JFK magic bullet theory or even really what happened. The only
people who knows are shot or a cop.
So like a normal neighborhood dealing with the loss of someone they
love, they started breaking into every shopping center plaza store and
gas station. Newsreels yell “Riot!” “Looters!” As every stupid item gets
stolen and the “looters” get to burning stores to the ground. You
cannot find Jordans, rims, weaves or Quick Trips in Ferguson, MO.
Not 100% certain what any of this solved or how it was useful. But from
what I have gathered from staying up watching the news and listening to
police scanners, they were trying to rob a bank, break into a police
station, grab guns from a Cabelas.
SOURCE
Leftists talk tolerance but advocate censorship
We often hear those on the right branded as “intolerant.” We’re all a
bunch of extremists who just want to shut down the other side, right?
We’re unlike those on the left, who welcome debate and want to give all
viewpoints a respectful hearing.
Or so we’re told. We might even start to believe it — until we encounter
the oh-so-tolerant voices of our loyal opposition. Voices such as:
Josh Barro: This New York Times reporter has said of viewpoints that he
calls “anti-LGBT” (lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender): “We need to stamp
them out, ruthlessly.” So he has little patience with Heritage
Foundation expert Ryan Anderson, an expert on marriage issues well-known
as an informed and courteous debater.
In a recent Twitter exchange with Mr. Barro, Mr. Anderson told him: “We
may disagree, but [there is] no need to be uncivil,” adding, “Even in
the midst of disagreement, we should treat all people with respect.” Mr.
Barro disagreed: “Some policy views render people unworthy of respect.”
SOURCE
20 August, 2014
Australia: Chinese cafe owner was foolishly frank
He was obviously unaware of ubiquitous Western prohibitions on
discrimination. Westerners know that you find some other reason to
give if you don't want to hire a protected minority. In China,
however, there is widespread disapproval of Africans so you can safely
say what you want about them there
The rejected barista
A Brazilian-born Australian man has told how he was denied a job as a
barista after a cafe owner told him his customers wouldn't want their
'coffee made by black people'.
Patrons of the Forbes and Burton café in Darlinghurst, inner city
Sydney, were stunned to hear Nilson Dos Santos, an Australian citizen,
had been turned down for the job because the owner
'only wanted locals'.
In incredible scenes, after being told by the cafe owner, who would only
give his name as 'Steven', that he was not right for the job, Mr Dos
Santos, 39, stood up and addressed the other customers at about 1.30pm
on Sunday and told them why he had been turned down and asked if they
would have a problem being served by a black man.
In a sign of solidarity, many walked out - and a staff member even quit on the spot.
There was also outrage among other customers who took to social media and urged others to boycott the cafe.
Steven, from Shanghai, China, who confirmed he was the owner, admitted
to Daily Mail Australia that the fact Mr Dos Santos was black was the
reason he didn't give him the job.
‘There are a lot of white customers at the café and I think the clients
here want local people, not African people,' said Steven, who arrived in
Australia from China this year. ‘We need to offer good service at
this café and I think the coffee culture is more about white people.’
Mr Dos Santos, who recently became an Australian citizen, has worked as a barista in Sydney for nine years.
SOURCE
UK: Slang causes offence
A Ukip MEP has apologised "profusely" after calling a Thai constituent, and member of the party, a "ting tong".
Janice Atkinson, who represents the south east, was recorded making the
comments after meeting Fa Munday, a mobile food seller in Ramsgate,
Kent. She said: "..so that was good. We've got Fa who's, I dunno,
she's a ting tong from somewhere."
Mrs Munday and her husband Vincent, both loyal Ukip supporters, handed
back their membership of the party claiming they felt “betrayed”.
The caterer, 35, who has lived in England since she got married eight years ago, said: "I can't understand why she said that.
"It left me feeling hurt and disgusted. Nobody has ever spoken to me in that way."
Senior party member Ms Atkinson's comments were captured by the BBC team
while she spoke to local people and Ukip members in Ramsgate.
She insisted the comments were naive rather than malicious and said she was "incredibly sorry" for offending the couple.
She said: "I deeply regret the words I used and am incredibly sorry. It
was poor judgment and naivety on my part rather than words spoken with
any malice. I am devastated that I have caused hurt and apologise
profusely to both Mr and Mrs Munday."
A Ukip spokesman said: "Janice has apologised for the words she used.
Ukip in no way condones the use of language that may reflect prejudice
or cause offence and we sincerely hope this matter can be resolved
privately."
SOURCE
19 August, 2014
Australia: Bikini babe covered up at the Brisbane agricultural show
The image of a woman in a skimpy bikini painted on an Ekka [Exhibition]
ride was covered up after the Queensland director of the Australian
Christian Lobby slammed it as inappropriate for children.
The mural image was featured on the Rip Tide attraction located in the
children’s rides section of the showgrounds, off St Paul’s Terrace.
The ACL’s Wendy Francis started a change.org petition on Saturday after
being alerted to the image of a busty blonde woman with only thin strips
of pink fabric covering her nipples. “If this image was in an
adult workplace it would be deemed as sexual harassment and removed,” Ms
Francis wrote on the petition.
“Our children's innocence should not be compromised by attending the
Brisbane Ekka - one of the highlights of the year for many families.
Sexual imagery is inappropriate here. “Please have these images
removed and keep the Ekka as a family friendly place to go.”
RNA chief executive Brendan Christou said officials were made aware of the image on Saturday night and had it covered overnight.
“This was an unfortunate and isolated oversight, which we swiftly moved
to have resolved,” Mr Christou said. “The RNA appreciates and
shares all the concerns raised and is sorry for any offence this image
may have caused.”
Ms Francis is a dedicated campaigner for PG-only images in outdoor
advertising, with billboards for erectile dysfunction products one of
her better known targets.
SOURCE
Ms Francis should see the fantasy women in the computer games most kids play
'Unkind comments about depression was never my intention': KISS
bassist Gene Simmons apologises for saying depressed people should 'f***
off and kill themselves'
Loud-mouthed rocker Gene Simmons has profusely apologised for his
outrageous remarks about people battling with mental health and has even
deleted his Twitter account following a serious backlash from fans
across the globe.
The outspoken KISS bass guitarist made the insensitive remarks, which
prompted radio stations around the world to boycott the band’s music,
just two weeks before tweeting his condolences about the suicide of
comedian Robin Williams.
Simmons publicly apologised on both his Twitter and Facebook accounts
after social media users reacted with disgust about the musician’s
astounding rant which included the harsh words: ‘F***you, then kill
yourself’ when talking about people who suffer from depression and
addictions.
But the damage was already done as far as many of his dedicated fans
were concerned and Simmons has since deleted his Twitter account which
he used on a daily basis.
Simmons' public apology on his Facebook page which was also posted on his Twitter account but he has deleted it since
Australia's Triple M radio station, Canadian stations Power97 and BobFM
and New York's longtime WPYX DJ Uncle Vito all led boycotts of KISS
music in the wake of Simmons' comments.
SOURCE
Pop musicians get away with a lot but sometimes they get called out
18 August, 2014
Controversy over the portrayal of Japanese characters in theatre
A controversy sparked by the Seattle Gilbert and Sullivan Society’s
recent production of The Mikado, the comic opera traditionally played by
white actors made up as Japanese characters.
The Seattle Times’ opinion editor, Sharon Pian Tan, wrote an outraged
piece after seeing the performance. She wrote that the
“yellowface” used in the portrayal of 40 Japanese characters was as ugly
and outdated as the use of blackface, which has long been taboo in
America.
“A black wig and white face powder stand in for shoeshine. Bowing and
shuffling replaces tap dancing. Fans flutter where banjos would be
strummed,” Tan wrote.
Though the company had never provoked such outrage with its ten previous
productions of the Mikado, the piece struck a chord and soon protesters
gathered at the theatre and a range of community groups joined the call
for the show to be scrapped.
A story on the controversy by All Things Considered, the flagship public
radio current affairs program noted that there has recently been
several instances of the use of yellow face in pop culture prompting
outrage. Commentators on that program were of the view that there was
not an increase in the use of yellowface, but it was more noticeable
now.
“But this production of The Mikado is still racial caricature. It is
still a show where an all-white cast (including two Latinos) plays 40
Japanese roles. Every snap of the fan was a slap in the face.
“When people of other races don costumes and makeup to play the role of
an Asian person, that’s yellowface. Racial caricature — even when done
with the purest of artistic motives and sincere love of other cultures —
is still racial caricature.
SOURCE
A storm in a teacup. No word of actual Japanese people
objecting. Japan is big enough to look after itself. No need
for phony Leftist outrage.
Ad man fired by agency over "transphobia"
Heroic truth-teller, McInnes above
Gavin McInnes, chief creative officer of Rooster in New York, has been
asked to take an indefinite leave of absence following the publication
of a transphobic essay.
Published earlier this week on Thought Catalog, "Transphobia is
Perfectly Natural" has at publication received 2,082 comments. It has
also sparked a "Boycott Rooster" movement, with Tumblr and Twitter
accounts asking followers to let Rooster clients—Vans, Red Bull, Fox
Sports and others—know they will not support companies that work with
McInnes.
"Gavin's views are his own and do not represent those of the company or
its members," said a Rooster representative. "We are extremely
disappointed with his actions and have asked that he take a leave of
absence while we determine the most appropriate course of action."
McInnes co-founded Rooster in 2010 as an agency that would make ads for
people who hate ads. He has appeared in the shop's work for Vans, most
recently as the man who explains how to do absolutely everything.
SOURCE
That his comments were correct seems to have been ignored. I have put his essay up on POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH
17 August, 2014
Apple store criticised after receipt shows employee branded customer a “f@g”
NOTE to retailers: don’t hate on your customers.
Otherwise, you might end up like this Apple employee, who has the
internet up in arms after handing an Oregon man a receipt with a
homophobic slur in place of an email address.
Somehow, we don’t think f@g.com is a legitimate email account.
Adam Catanzarite, who identifies as “queer”, posted the tasteless
receipt to his Facebook page criticising Apple and calling on them to
offer cultural competency training for all its employees.
Mr Catanzarite had purchased a $29 pair of earpods from the Pioneer
Apple Store in Portland on July 8, and posted the receipt on Tuesday
after discovering the slur. It has since spread across the internet.
The offensive email address was added after Mr Cantazarite declined to give his to the employee.
SOURCE
Looks like the comment was accurate, anyway. Why would a
homosexual be ashamed of being decribed as what he is?. Where's
gay pride?
A rap over the knuckles for US prosecutors
Vonte Skinner is one of the many amateur rap artists whose lyrics have
been used as evidence against them in US court cases. Skinner was
charged and convicted of attempted murder by a New Jersey court in 2008.
Part of the evidence submitted by the prosecution, and which led to his
conviction, was a notebook full of scrawled rap lyrics that was found
in Skinner’s car.
This decision was overturned by the New Jersey appeals court in 2012
which deemed the lyrics inadmissible. Due to a split decision at the
appellate court, the prosecution was able to take the case to the New
Jersey Supreme Court which last week finally ruled in Skinner’s favour.
In a unanimous verdict, the court upheld fundamental principles of
freedom of expression, denounced the state’s prejudicial use of song
lyrics and upheld the right to be offensive:
‘To be sure, writing rap lyrics – even disturbingly graphic lyrics, like
the defendant’s – is not a crime. Nor is it a bad act or a wrong to
engage in the act of writing about unpalatable subjects, including
inflammatory subjects such as depicting events or lifestyles that may be
condemned as anti-social, mean-spirited, or amoral.’
The Supreme Court justices used their own examples to underline the absurdity of using fictional materials to aid prosecutions:
‘One cannot presume that, simply because an author has chosen to write
about certain topics, he or she has acted in accordance with those
views. One would not presume that Bob Marley, who wrote the well-known
song “I Shot the Sheriff”, actually shot a sheriff, or that Edgar Allan
Poe buried a man beneath his floorboards, as depicted in his short story
“The Tell-Tale Heart”.’
Vonte Skinner will now be retried for attempted murder; his rap lyrics
will not be admissible as evidence, nor will similar forms of artistic
expression be admissible in future cases.
SOURCE
15 August, 2014
'Hate speech' no longer part of Canada's Human Rights Act
A contentious section of Canadian human rights law, long criticized by
free-speech advocates as overly restrictive and tantamount to
censorship, is gone for good.
A private member’s bill repealing Section 13 of the Canadian Human
Rights Act, the so-called “hate speech provision,” passed in the Senate
this week. Its passage means the part of Canadian human rights law that
permitted rights complaints to the federal Human Rights Commission for
“the communication of hate messages by telephone or on the Internet”
will soon be history.
The bill from Alberta Conservative MP Brian Storseth passed in the House
of Commons last summer, but needed Senate approval. It has received
royal assent and will take effect after a one-year phase-in period.
An “ecstatic” Storseth said the bill, which he says had wide support
across ideological lines and diverse religious groups, repeals a “flawed
piece of legislation” and he called Canada’s human rights tribunal “a
quasi-judicial, secretive body that takes away your natural rights as a
Canadian.”
SOURCE
Young Miss?
News reports now suggest that a small cadre of faculty members at the
University of Mississippi want to ban the use of “Ole Miss” as the
school’s nickname owing to its “racist” origins. Never mind that a
survey conducted by the university itself found that a majority of
respondents reported that “Ole Miss” was nothing more than convenient
shorthand for “The University of Mississippi” (and it fits better on
football helmets and baseball and basketball jerseys).
What is the origin of “Ole Miss”? Slaves coined it, in reference to the
wife of the planter to whom they were bound. If the planter and his wife
had a daughter, she was called the “young miss.” The term, hence, did
originate in the slave culture of the cotton south, but its racist the
connection is indirect insofar as it grew from the linguistic usages of
the slaves themselves. (Truth in advertising: Until 2011, I was on the
faculty at the University of Mississippi for 23 years; I am a Rebel as
well as an Aggie.)
Slavery and “Ole Miss” are anachronisms, but history happened and cannot
be expunged by linguistic revisionism, unless we are willing to
establish an Orwellian Ministry of Truth that erases our collective
memory. Ole Miss already has banned the Beauregard (“Rebel”) flag and
“Colonel Reb” as its on-field mascot, substituting for them a black bear
having no historical context other than a possibly apocryphal
bear-shooting visit to the state by Teddy Roosevelt.
The University of Utah just reached an agreement with the “Utes”
allowing the school to continue to use its nickname in return for a
promise of college scholarships earmarked for members of that tribe of
Native Americans. I suspect that a payoff in cash or in kind likewise is
the underlying goal of individuals and groups opposed to “Ole Miss.”
SOURCE
14 August, 2014
Must NEVER use the word "retard"
Justin Theroux—actor, screenwriter, and Jennifer Aniston's fiance—hates political correctness.
Theroux plays a small town police chief in HBO's extraordinarily bleak
new series "The Leftovers," which chronicles life in a suburban
community three years after 2 percent of the world's population vanished
into thin air.
In an interview with Elle, Theroux said that in order to sit through the
show without needing to consult a therapist afterwards, viewers must
learn to appreciate the (very) occasional "bursts of light."
Originally a screenwriter, Theroux is used to much lighter fare. He
co-wrote the 2012 comedy "Rock of Ages" and 2008 comedy "Tropic
Thunder." Theroux was apparently appalled by the outcry over the use of
the word "retard" in the film, arguing that political correctness has
become so egregious that it's smothering creativity—and comedy.
"There's a certain point where political correctness becomes extremely
conservative and it skews to a point where it becomes humorless,"
Theroux said. "I was so saddened that people were offended by the
full-r-word scene, because we worked really hard making sure that joke
was aimed at Hollywood and actors portraying mentally challenged people.
I remember being so bummed out. They literally picketed us. It was
like, 'Really? Satire is allowed to do this!'"
He added: "Political correctness has become really insidious."
SOURCE
British GP surgery tries to BAN its own patients from posting critical comments about standard of care on Facebook
A GP surgery tried to ban its own patients from posting negative comments about the practice on social media.
A poster at the St Lawrence Medical Practice in Braintree, Essex, warned
patients that criticisms could be treated as a breach of its 'zero
tolerance policy' against abusive treatment if posted on Facebook and
Twitter.
The request was made after staff allegedly saw bad language used to describe the surgery's standard of care on a Facebook page.
The sign, which has since been changed, read: 'If you have any comments
or complaints about the surgery please write to the practice manager.
'Do not use social media sites, Facebook/Twitter.
'Any comments we see on social media sites may be seen as a breach of our zero tolerance policy.
'We are happy to deal with your comments/complaints in the usual way.'
Practice Manager Alison Rudkin said the sign had been changed and now
says: 'This ensures we can respond to people's concerns with patient
confidentiality in mind'.
Katherine Murphy, Chief Executive of The Patients Association which
gathers healthcare feedback from people all over the UK said: 'We
believe people should be able to share and explore good and not so good
feedback, and also to leave feedback on their personal experiences
across the entire spectrum of healthcare.
SOURCE
13 August, 2014
As Orwell foresaw, war is peace; peace is war
Governments often misuse language to build emotional and patriotic
support for their policies. This Orwellian use of language is clearly
evident in the way that US government policy uses the words “war” and
“peace.”
Everyone is well aware of the US military invasions in Iraq and
Afghanistan. Initiated during the Bush administration and continued
through the administration of Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama, the US
enlisted the assistance of other countries (but both invasions were
mainly undertaken by the US military) to bomb those countries, occupy
them with ground troops, and overthrow their governments. There was no
declaration of war in either case. Those invasions of Iraq and
Afghanistan, and the subsequent occupation by American troops, were
called peacekeeping operations.
When we bomb other countries, invade them with our troops, and topple their governments, that is what we call peace.
Meanwhile, we refer to many of our domestic policies as wars. We have a
war on drugs, a war on poverty, a war on terror, and lesser wars like
the war on obesity, the war on smoking, and the war on coal. The list
could go on.
In the post-Cold War era, everyone knows the US is the World’s
policeman, or the World’s bully, depending on one’s point of view. But
when we impose our preferences on people in other countries through the
use of military force, we call that peace. In war, one side fights
another, and linguistically, our peacekeeping missions are telling
people that we are helping them out by destabilizing their governments
and killing their countrymen.
At home, the language of war invokes images of a patriotic effort to
fight an enemy, whether the enemy is poverty or obesity or coal, and
invokes images of treason for those who dare to speak out against the
nation’s efforts to fight its enemies. Offering support to the
opposition in one of our wars is unpatriotic and treasonous.
By misusing language in this way, words lose precision in their
meanings. When bombing people is peace and providing food to poor people
is war, those words that are misused for their emotional connotations
no longer refer to clear concepts. In both cases, the Orwellian language
does serve a clear purpose. It builds support for the state, and
facilitates its foreign and domestic policies.
SOURCE
Pat Condell's latest: Peace in the Middle East
12 August, 2014
Must not condemn Muslims
Given the animalistic barbarity presently being practiced by Muslims
in Northern Syria and Iraq, it seems to me immoral NOT to condemn
Muslims. They are the chief source of barbarity in the world today
There is no excuse for the offensive and racist tweet from Gavin Ellzey against Muslims.
Ellzey is the vice chairman of the Kansas Republican 3rd Congressional
District Committee. He said on Twitter in early July that “offending
Muslims is the duty of any civilized person” — adding, “Especially with a
.45,” The Kansas City Star reported.
That was a reference to a .45-caliber firearm. Ellzey of Overland Park
admitted to writing the tweet, saying it was in response to TV news
reports of attacks on Christians. “Sometimes you overreact,” Ellzey told
The Star.
Mahnaz Shabbir, a Kansas City area Muslim advocate with the Crescent
Peace Society, was right to criticize Ellzey for his horrific tweets.
But she didn’t go far enough.
The Republican Party can hardly afford to have anyone in a leadership
position spewing that kind of hatred. Ellzey did the right thing and
resigned Wednesday night, but he should also publicly apologize.
SOURCE
Must not preach Bible teachings in Canada
Last month I wrote an opinion piece headlined, “The coming Christian
revolt.” It was featured in multiple publications, including the print
edition of the Newfoundland Herald, a weekly news and entertainment
magazine circulated throughout Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Among other things, I noted this objective reality in the piece – a
reality demonstrated with crystal clarity by liberals’ (to include the
Canadian government’s) contemptible response to the column itself: “To
fully advance the causes of radical feminism, abortion-on-demand,
unfettered sexual license, ‘gay marriage’ and the like, the pagan left
must do away with religious free exercise altogether [not to mention
free speech].
“Under the guise of ‘anti-discrimination,’ Christians today face discrimination at unprecedented levels. …
“Christians,” I continued, “true Christians – regenerate,
Bible-believing Christians who strive their level best to maintain
fidelity to the word of God and honor His commands – will not, indeed
cannot, participate in, approve of, facilitate or encourage certain
behaviors deemed by the Holy Scriptures to be immoral or sinful.
“In the ongoing culture war, it seems there are no rules of engagement.
The secular left will accept nothing short of unconditional surrender.
That is to say, the pagans demand that we Christians abandon the
biblical worldview altogether, and adopt their own. “This will
never happen.”
CBC News, the “largest news broadcaster in Canada,” reported on both my
column and the ensuing response: “Members of a Newfoundland and Labrador
Pride group were so outraged about a two-page anti-gay [read:
Christian] letter to the editor published by an entertainment magazine
in the province, they filed a human rights complaint.”
Several other “gay rights” organizations have since picked up their
pitchforks and joined the mob. The Canadian government was likewise
quick to react. Remzi Cej of Canada’s “Human Rights Commission”
(something between a Star Chamber and a kangaroo court, but without that
level of credibility) said, “he’s disappointed that the Herald has
cited ‘free speech’ as justification for publishing the opposing view”
(because, of course, to the leftist, free speech is only “free” when
it’s speech with which they agree).
“Western Pride NL member Kyle Curlew, who initiated filing the
complaint, said his ‘jaw dropped’ when he first saw the two-page
letter. “‘I couldn’t even believe that it was published in the
Herald. It was a rallying call for people to stand against LGBT rights.
Essentially, hate propaganda,’ Curlew told CBC.
The Telegram, another mainstream Canadian publication, further reported
that both my column and the fact that the Newfoundland Herald published
it each constitute “a hate crime under the Criminal Code of Canada.”
(Ahh … don’t you love the smell of tyranny in the morning? Come and get
me, you homofascist Canucks.)
Indeed, the self-styled champions of “tolerance” and “diversity” prove,
over and again, to be the most intolerant and monolithic among us. Their
version of “intolerance” (i.e., any philosophical position that runs
afoul of the rigid dictates of “political correctness”) simply will not
be tolerated.
The left is a walking paradox. It is irony personified. While liberals’
complete lack of self-awareness, self-righteous snobbery, aloof
emotionalism and obtuse circular reasoning make them an easy target for
ridicule, these things quickly move from curious to dangerous when they
control the reins of government.
SOURCE
11 August, 2014
British shop chain withdraws 'offensive and disgusting' OCD hand-wash
A hand-sanitiser whose packaging mocked sufferers of
obsessive-compulsive disorder has been removed from sale by Paperchase,
the birthday card chain-store, following criticism from mental health
charities.
The ‘OCD’ hand-soap provoked outrage among sufferers and campaigners,
who said the product is “disgusting” and “offensive” and stigmatises
people with the condition.
Directions for the product read: "Open cap. Sanitize. Close cap. Open
cap. Sanitize. Close cap. Make sure cap is firmly closed. Recheck cap.
Are you sure it's closed?"
Paperchase has now withdrawn the product from its 130 stores, although a
spokesman was unable to was unable to say whether the chain for
apologised for the offence caused.
OCD, which affects 12 in every 1,000 Britons, is an anxiety disorder
where sufferers experience intrusive or unwelcome thoughts, often
causing them to perform certain actions, such as hand-washing,
repeatedly.
Charities said that the existence of products that “trivialise” mental illness could cause sufferers “very real harm”.
SOURCE
Outspoken Jewish comedian criticized for speaking the truth about Gaza
The Arabs of Gaza have indeed started and continued the fight there so they have created their resultant suffering
Joan Rivers has said she has no sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians in Gaza, declaring they ‘deserve to be dead’.
The 81-year-old comedian launched a furious rant outside a Los Angeles
airport, saying that the Palestinians who do not leave their homes are
‘idiots’ and that ‘at least the ones that were killed were the ones with
very low IQs’.
Rivers’ rant came when a photographer asked for her opinion on the
conflict on the Gaza strip as she was leaving LAX airport on Wednesday.
The TV presenter first compared Gaza's rocket attacks to going to
Madonna's house to 'throw paint bottles’ and the civilian casualties to
the victims of Hiroshima.
She then said the thought the nearly 2,000 Palestinian who have died on
the Gaza strip since Israel launched military operations in the area a
month ago 'deserved it'.
'When you declare war, you declare war,' Rivers said.
‘They started it. We now don't count who's dead. You're dead. You
deserve to be dead. You started it. You started it. Don't you dare make
me feel sad about that.’
SOURCE
10 August, 2014
Australia: School chaplain sacked over Facebook post calling homosexuality 'not normal'
He's perfectly right. Homosexuality is statistically not normal. Only about 2% of the population are queer
A Hobart school chaplain has been sacked for re-posting a comment on Facebook that described homosexuality as "not normal".
Troy Williams was employed by the Scripture Union, Tasmania's main
provider of school chaplaincy services which appoints and trains state
and private school chaplains.
Mr Williams was stood down from his role at the Hobart College over the
post, which also makes the claim that "no-one is born gay".
Mr Williams issued an apology after his Facebook post drew widespread condemnation earlier this month.
SOURCE
Woman's anger at 'who's got the kids' question
She was delighted to be part of the BBC team sent out to Brazil to cover
the World Cup football tournament. But Gabby Logan was annoyed to
be repeatedly asked: ‘Who’s looking after your children?’
Her nine-year-old twins Reuben and Lois were left at home with their
father, former Scottish rugby star Kenny Logan, 42, while Mrs Logan, 41,
was working in Brazil.
And despite admitting she was relieved when England were knocked out
because it meant she could go back to being a mother, Mrs Logan
expressed surprise that people still think a woman’s place is in the
home.
In a new interview she said: ‘People still think it’s a woman’s
responsibility to organise everything. When I was away, some of the mums
at school asked Kenny how he was coping.
'No one asked me that when he was working in Australia last year. I’m
often asked who’s looking after the children when I’m away, yet my male
colleagues aren’t.’
SOURCE
Is she so dim as not to know that most childcare is done by women?
8 August, 2014
Anti-Israel hate speech comments skyrocket on French internet
Moderators of French websites have been overwhelmed by a storm of hatred
over the Israeli incursion into Gaza. The latest conflict has triggered
outbreaks of violence in France between the country’s Jewish and Muslim
populations.
While Parisian protests over Israel’s operation in Gaza descend into
violence and clashes, the internet has seen an explosion of hate speech
related to the conflict. French law bans racist, anti-Semitic or
discriminatory messages, but moderators have been hard-pressed to keep
up with the rise in hateful comments.
Representatives from companies that monitor online content told AFP that
they normally block 25 to 40 percent of comments, but since the Israeli
incursion this statistic has shot up to up to 95 percent.
SOURCE
Attempt by hotel to quash criticism
The owner of a US hotel that threatened to charge guests $US500 if they
wrote a bad review has taken to social media to explain that it was a
gag gone wrong. Chris Wagoner, owner of the Union Street Guest
House, posted to the hotel’s Facebook page explaining the policy was
“originally intended as a joke” and something he never told employees to
enforce.
Wagoner’s explanation follows hundreds of angry posts made on social
media sites and accommodation review sites slamming the $US500 fee
for every negative review a guest makes. While Wagoner says the hotel
has not enforced the policy fee, Rabih Zahnan. who was a guest at the
hotel, claimed he was threatened with a charge for a negative review he
posted online.
"The management of this hotel had the gall to email us twice to
threaten us financially about the negative review! Disgusting!
Instead of taking responsibility and striving to improve their customer
service, they instead resort to intimidation!"
Wagoner admits he was “embarrassed” the joke went “viral for all the
wrong reasons” “I now realize this joke was made in poor taste and not
at all funny."
SOURCE
7 August, 2014
Catholic Cardinal: Massachusetts Law is 'Unjust Limitation on Free Speech'
Boston Cardinal Sean O’Malley blasted a new Massachusetts law limiting protesters’ access to abortion clinics.
“In spite of a unanimous decision of the United States Supreme Court
declaring unconstitutional the Massachusetts law enforcing a 35 foot
'buffer zone' around abortion clinics, the Massachusetts legislature
acted with unseemly haste to establish what amounts to a new buffer zone
of 25 feet,” the Cardinal said in a statement on his blog Friday.
SOURCE
Antisemitic Australian columnist uses the sort of hate speech that Leftists condemn in others
Mike Carlton has always been a hate-filled extreme Leftist.
Abuse is his modus operandi. And he seems to loathe Israel most of
all
The issue at stake here is not whether fallen Fairfax columnist Mike
Carlton was right or wrong about Israel. The only issue is that he has
been deemed to have responded inappropriately to readers on email and
social media, unleashing all sorts of put-downs and expletives.
On this issue, his bosses were clear. “You just can’t do that,”
Fairfax business publisher Sean Aylmer said on radio. The language was
“not acceptable in the workplace. “No one has the right to treat
readers that way.”
The thing to remember about Carlton’s tone is that he is on the
political left. This is the same side of political opinion which for
years has campaigned for moderation and sensitivity in language. Many on
the left reckon that the old adage of “sticks and stones may break my
bones but names will never hurt me” doesn’t always apply.
The left has for many years made a big thing of encouraging, nay
DEMANDING, the use of sensitive language in relation to women, the
disabled, minorities and others.
But Carlton has been the opposite of sensitive with his language. Again,
this is not about Israel. This is about decency, about not vilifying
others with words as weapons.
What really rankles with this drama today is the people lining up on
social media to support him. Effectively they’re saying “hey, no one has
the right to use insulting language, unless of course they’re my good
mate Mike”.
As you read this, Carlton is already receiving job offers on social
media from a raft of people whose print and/or online publications
wouldn’t dream of insulting and abusing strangers. Why the double
standard? It doesn’t even begin to make sense.
SOURCE
An excerpt from Carlton's original column:
"The onslaught is indiscriminate and unrelenting, with but one possible
conclusion: Israel is not fighting the terrorists of Hamas. In defiance
of the laws of war and the norms of civilised behaviour, it is waging
its own war of terror on the entire Gaza population of about 1.7 million
people. Call it genocide, call it ethnic cleansing: the aim is to kill
Arabs."
6 August, 2014
Must not describe PLANTS as foreign in Britain
With its amiable discussions on greenfly and compost, it may seem as
innocuous as a radio show could be. So regular listeners to
Gardeners’ Question Time will be surprised to find it caught up in a
race row.
For an academic claims that Radio 4’s long-running programme is
spreading covert racist stereotypes disguised as horticultural advice.
Dr Ben Pitcher, a senior lecturer in sociology at the University of
Westminster, says the panel show is ‘saturated’ with racial language.
From debates about native and non-native plant species to advice about
the purity of different soil types, the programme’s resident
green-fingered experts are secretly feeding nationalist and fascist
fantasies, he claims.
Speaking on another Radio 4 programme, Thinking Allowed, he said:
‘Gardeners’ Question Time is not the most controversial show on Radio 4,
and yet it is layered with, saturated with, racial meanings. The
context here is the rise of nationalism. The rise of racist and fascist
parties across Europe. Nationalism is about shoring up a fantasy of
national integrity. My question is, what feeds nationalism? What makes
nationalism powerful?’
White people are therefore forced to find other ways of talking about
white identity – such as through gardening – so they do not appear to be
racist.
SOURCE
Racist hate speech from a Democrat
Kentucky Democrats are at it again. They're attacking Republican Senator
Mitch McConnell's wife and former Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao for
her Asian heritage. You'll recall last year when Progress Kentucky sent
out a series of tweets vilifying Chao and McConnell's "very close ties
to China."
"Progress Kentucky, a Democratic super PAC with its
sights on toppling Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), has
drawn backlash for a persistent effort to suggest that the senator's
wife's Chinese roots have led him to embrace anti-American policies.
In a Feb. 14 tweet, the group made a particularly
blunt jab suggesting that Elaine Chao, former labor secretary under
President George W. Bush and McConnell's second wife, was encouraging
him to support outsourcing jobs to China."
"This woman has the ear of @mcconnellpress -- she's his #wife. May explain why your job moved to #China!" the tweet read.
Now Kathy Groob, who claims to be an advocate for women in politics, has
attacked Chao as Asian and claimed because she is Asian, that she isn't
from Kentucky. Groob made the statements in a series of tweets over the
weekend.
SOURCE
5 August, 2014
No free speech for critics of California agency: Caltrans muzzled Bay Bridge critics, report says
Caltrans sought to silence engineers who voiced concerns about cost
overruns or construction defects on the new Bay Bridge eastern span,
forcing several of them from the project, according to an investigative
report prepared for a state Senate committee.
Eight engineers who either worked for Caltrans or had contracts with the
state agency had to leave their posts, as did a ninth who worked for
the bridge's builder, according to the report released Thursday by the
Senate Transportation and Housing Committee.
Several engineers criticized the quality of welding work on giant deck
sections and tower components that began in 2007 at a factory in
Shanghai, while others balked at costly change orders that they saw as
benefiting the bridge's lead contractor.
Caltrans has said cracks were found in numerous welds in deck sections
made by Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., known as ZPMC. But it says
they were not a safety concern and that the welds have been repaired.
Engineers have said they fear lingering weld flaws could worsen over
time, leading to cracks in the road decks. Doug Coe, one of the veteran
engineers who has gone public about weld concerns, testified before the
state Senate committee earlier this year that critics had their "heads
chopped off."
Coe was one of the engineers Caltrans and the bridge's project manager,
Tony Anziano, forced from the Bay Bridge job after they criticized work
being done at ZPMC, a crane maker that had never built a bridge before,
the state Senate report said. It said Anziano and the state agency
appeared to have a policy of squelching dissent to speed up work on the
long-delayed bridge, which at $6.4 billion came in $5 billion over
budget.
"This inquiry has uncovered too much testimony fueling the cover-up
charge to ignore," said the report, written by former investigative
journalist Roland De Wolk.
SOURCE
Australia: Sydney newspaper apologises for 'anti-Semitic' cartoon
A newspaper has been forced to apologise for publishing a cartoon that
showed a Jewish man watching the bombing of Gaza from his armchair
to accompany a column about the Middle East crisis.
The Sydney Morning Herald was slammed by the Attorney-General and the
Jewish community for using the drawing of an old man seated in an
armchair emblazoned with the Star of David, watching comfortably from a
hill as bombs dropped on Gaza.
The paper's Editor-in-Chief Darren Goodsir on Monday said it was a
'serious error of judgement' when they published the cartoon drawn by
Glen Le Lievre on July 26.
'The Herald now appreciates that, in using the Star of David and the
kippah in the cartoon, the newspaper invoked an inappropriate element of
religion, rather than nationhood, and made a serious error of judgment.
'It was wrong to publish the cartoon in its original form,' Mr Goodsir wrote.
The Sydney Morning Herald said the cartoon was based on real life
photographs that showed men seated in chairs 'observing the shelling of
Gaza from the hills of Sderot'.
The column's writer Mike Carlton tweeted examples of such photographs on Monday.
'It was wrong to publish the cartoon in its original form. We apologise
unreservedly for this lapse, and the anguish and distress that has been
caused,' the Herald's apology continued.
SOURCE
The cartoon was clearly implying that the Jewish guy in the chair was
using a remote control to blow up Gaza, which is a terrible
distortion of the deadly risks that Israeli soldiers take in Gaza --
leading to death for some of them.
4 August, 2014
ESPN Host Apologizes for Implying Women Provoke Domestic Abuse
ESPN host Stephen A. Smith apologized Monday for comments he made
on Friday’s edition of “First Take” which seemed to blame the victim in
cases of domestic violence.
Smith was commenting on the subject of domestic violence after the NFL
suspended Baltimore Ravens’ Ray Rice two games following a Feb. 15
domestic dispute in Atlantic City with his then-fiancee, Janay Palmer.
Rice pleaded not guilty to third-degree aggravated assault for the
incident, during which Rice allegedly struck Palmer and was caught on
video dragging her from a casino elevator.
Rice avoided trial by being accepted into a pre-trial intervention
program in May. He married his fiancée one day after he was indicted.
“As a man raised by the greatest mother in the world and four older
sisters, I’ve religiously spoken out against domestic violence all of my
life. I’ve done so repeatedly over 20 years in this business as well as
over these very airwaves – right here on First Take,” Smith said
Monday.
On Friday’s “First Take,” Smith said, “We keep talking about the guys.
We know you have no business putting your hands on a woman.”
Then he addressed women, saying, “Let’s make sure we don’t do anything
to provoke wrong actions,” because contacting law enforcement afterwards
“doesn’t negate the fact that they already put their hands on you.”
“So let’s try to make sure that we can do our part in making sure that that doesn’t happen,” he said.
“We know they’re wrong. We know they’re criminal. We know they probably
deserve to be in jail,” Smith said, adding that in Rice’s case, “he
probably deserves more than the two-game suspension.”
“But at the same time, we also have to make sure that we learn as much
as we can about elements of provocation – not that there’s real
provocation – but the elements of provocation,” Smith said.
SOURCE
There's no doubt that some women are aggresive and oppressive towards
men and some men do hit back over that -- so I think his comments were
moderate. I have personally encountered women who wanted to be
beaten -- though I refused to go along with it
Australian budget airline apologises after crew member advises passengers to flush their drugs
Jetstar has apologised after a crew member advised Splendour in the
Grass festival goers to dump their drugs before landing in Sydney.
People who attended the music festival near Byron Bay were on a flight
out of the Gold Coast on Sunday night when the crew member issued a
public announcement.
The flight attendant said sniffer dogs and quarantine officers were
waiting at the domestic terminal and advised them to flush "anything you
shouldn't have" down the toilet.
The announcement reportedly sparked a rush to the bathrooms.
Jetstar says the staff member will be reprimanded. The airline
says the staffer was complying with a requirement that airlines make
quarantine announcements, but the crew member's words were "poorly
chosen and plainly at odds with the professional standards we'd expect
from our team".
But some took a more positive view. "Thank you for caring for your
Splendour passengers," one person posted on Jetstar Australia's
Facebook page. "Very thoughtful and kind thing to do.
SOURCE
Byron Bay is a big hippy hangout. One smells marijuana rather a lot there
3 August, 2014
Paramount Australia apologises for poster of Ninja Turtles film
Paramount Australia has apologised after accidentally referencing 9/11 in a new poster for Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
The studio shared the poster on Tuesday through its official Twitter
page, which showed the four turtles diving from an exploding building
alongside the date it hits Australian cinemas - September 11.
The unintentional, but unmistakable connection to the terrorist attacks
on New York's World Trade Centre was met with swift backlash and outrage
on social media, and was deleted shortly after the oversight was
pointed out.
Since then, Paramount Australia issued a statement saying 'combining that image and date was a mistake'.
'We are deeply sorry to have used that artwork for the marketing
materials promoting the September 11 opening in Australia,' the
statement said.
SOURCE
No homophones allowed
A blogger for a school in Utah has lost his job after he wrote a post
explaining what a homophone is and his boss accused him of promoting a
gay agenda.
Until his recent dismissal, Tim Torkildson worked as a social media
strategist for the Nomen Global Language Center in Provo, a private
language school which aims to help students with their English.
One of Torkildon’s tasks was writing about the English language and his last post had focused on explaining what homophones are.
Homophones are words that sound the same but have different meanings and
often different spellings such as be and bee, through and threw, which
and witch.
When Torkildson’s boss, and the school’s owner, Clarke Woodger read the
article he called him into his office and told him he was fired.
‘Now our school is going to be associated with homosexuality,’ Woodger
complained, according to Torkildson, who posted their exchange on his
blog.
Torkildson said that while he understood that the word’s 'homo' prefix
might cause controversy, but he said that the explanation he had given
had been 'straightforward' and something that those in the early stages
of learning English needed to know.
SOURCE
1 August, 2014
British Leftist politician accused of 'trivialising the Holocaust' after comparing the Gaza Strip to a concentration camp
The overfed slob concerned
I suppose Germany's Jews in the 1930s must have been firing hundreds of rockets at their gentile neighbors
John Prescott was last night accused of being ‘deeply offensive’ to
Jewish people by comparing the Gaza Strip to a concentration camp.
The leaders of Britain’s Jews criticised the comments by the former
deputy prime minister, saying they ‘trivialised’ the Holocaust and
called on Labour officials to investigate his ‘misconduct’.
Lord Prescott wrote in the Sunday Mirror that Israel’s ‘indiscriminate’
bombardment of the Palestinian territory was a war crime and that Gaza
was a ‘ghetto’.
Some six million Jews were killed by the Nazis during the Second World
War, many in concentration camps, while many more were confined to
ghettos in major cities such as Warsaw.
Writing about Hamas, Lord Prescott said: ‘Israel brands them terrorists,
but it is acting as judge, jury and executioner in the concentration
camp that is Gaza.
‘What happened to the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis is appalling.
'But you would think those atrocities would give Israelis a unique sense
of perspective and empathy with the victims of a ghetto.’
The article provoked a stinging response from Vivian Wineman, president
of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and Mick Davis, chairman of
the Jewish Leadership Council.
In a letter to Opposition Chief Whip Lord Bassam, they said: ‘Comparing
Gaza to a concentration camp and a ghetto is deeply offensive.
'The systematic and premeditated slaughter of the Holocaust cannot in any way be compared to the conflict in Israel and Gaza.’
They added: ‘Through his remarks, Lord Prescott has trivialised the
Holocaust, the most painful memory in Jewish history, and will
undoubtedly encourage others to use such language.
'We trust that there are formal party processes to deal with such misconduct.’
SOURCE
WA: State pols weigh “In God We Trust” plaque
Should “In God We Trust” adorn the chambers of Washington state’s Pierce County Council?
That’s the apparently controversial question facing council members on
Tuesday, a day after a council committee decided to bring the proposal
to a vote of the full seven-member council, the Tacoma News Tribune
reports. Councilman Jim McCune, the Republican sponsor of the measure,
said the national motto is inspiring and patriotic — and he’s unclear
why the proposal has created such controversy.
“’In God We Trust’ is universal,” he told the newspaper. “It doesn’t
have ‘In Muhammad We Trust,’ it doesn’t have ‘In Jesus We Trust.’”
Council Chairman Dan Roach said most of the 20 emails he read as of
Monday opposed displaying a plaque emblazoned with the motto, which has
reportedly become part of a national movement in local government
buildings, with nearly 400 cities and counties in 23 states voting to
display the motto.
Councilmembers Connie Ladenburg, D-Tacoma, and Rick Talbert, D-Tacoma, both oppose the idea, saying it isn’t inclusive.
McCune, meanwhile, is defending his proposal. “I’m not doing this
for taking a stand or making a point,” he told the Tacoma News Tribune.
“I’m doing this because it is our national heritage.”
SOURCE
This is Tongue-Tied 2
Posts by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)
Alternative (monthly) archives for this blog are here
Is the American national anthem politically incorrect? From the 4th verse:
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
Mohammad
"HATE SPEECH" is free speech: The U.S. Supreme Court stated the general
rule regarding protected speech in Texas v. Johnson (109 S.Ct. at
2544), when it held: "The government may not prohibit the verbal or
nonverbal expression of an idea merely because society finds the idea
offensive or disagreeable." Federal courts have consistently followed this. Said Virginia federal district judge Claude Hilton: "The
First Amendment does not recognize exceptions for bigotry, racism, and
religious intolerance or ideas or matters some may deem trivial, vulgar
or profane."
Even some advocacy of violence is protected by the 1st Amendment. In
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the U.S. Supreme Court held unanimously that
speech advocating violent illegal actions to bring about social change
is protected by the First Amendment "except where such advocacy is
directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely
to incite or produce such action."
The double standard: Atheists can put up signs and billboards saying
that Christianity is wrong and that is hunky dory. But if a Christian
says that homosexuality is wrong, that is attacked as "hate speech"
"I think no subject should be off-limits, and I regard the laws in many
Continental countries criminalizing Holocaust denial as philosophically
repugnant and practically useless – in that they confirm to Jew-haters
that the Jews control everything (otherwise why aren’t we allowed to
talk about it?)" -- Mark Steyn
A prophetic comment on Norwegian hate speech laws: As Justice Brandeis
once noted, repressive censorship “breeds hate” and “that hate menaces
stable government,” rather than promoting safety; “the path of safety
lies in the opportunity to discuss freely supposed grievances and
proposed remedies.”
Voltaire's most famous saying was actually a summary of Voltaire's
thinking by one of his biographers rather than something Voltaire said
himself. Nonetheless it is a wholly admirable sentiment: "I disagree
with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
I am of a similar mind.
The traditional advice about derogatory speech: "Sticks and stones will
break your bones but names will never hurt you". Apparently people today
are not as emotionally robust as their ancestors were.
Thomas Jefferson on free speech: “It does me no injury for my
neighbors to say there are 20 gods, or no god. It neither picks my
pocket nor breaks my legs.”
The KKK were members of the DEMOCRATIC party. Google "Klanbake" if you doubt it
A phobia is an irrational fear, so the terms "Islamophobic" and
"homophobic" embody a claim that the people so described are mentally
ill. There is no evidence for either claim. Both terms are simply abuse
masquerading as diagnoses and suggest that the person using them is
engaged in propaganda rather than in any form of rational or objective
discourse.
Leftists often pretend that any mention of race is "racist" -- unless
they mention it, of course. But leaving such irrational propaganda
aside, which statements really are racist? Can statements of fact about
race be "racist"? Such statements are simply either true or false. The
most sweeping possible definition of racism is that a racist statement
is a statement that includes a negative value judgment of some race.
Absent that, a statement is not racist, for all that Leftists might howl
that it is. Facts cannot be racist so nor is the simple statement of
them racist. Here is a statement that cannot therefore be racist by
itself, though it could be false: "Blacks are on average much less
intelligent than whites". If it is false and someone utters it, he
could simply be mistaken or misinformed.
Categorization is a basic human survival skill so racism as the Left
define it (i.e. any awareness of race) is in fact neither right nor
wrong. It is simply human
Whatever your definition of racism, however, a statement that simply
mentions race is not thereby racist -- though one would think otherwise
from American Presidential election campaigns. Is a statement that
mentions dogs, "doggist" or a statement that mentions cats, "cattist"?
Was Abraham Lincoln a racist? "You and we are different races. We
have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any
other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but
this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think
your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while
ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If
this be admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be
separated. It is better for both, therefore, to be separated." -- Spoken at the White House to a group of black community leaders, August 14th, 1862
Gimlet-eyed Leftist haters sometimes pounce on the word "white" as
racist. Will the time come when we have to refer to the White House as
the "Full spectrum of light" House?
The spirit of liberty is "the spirit which is not too sure that it is
right." and "Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies
there, no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.
While it lies there it needs no constitution, no law, no court to save
it." -- Judge Learned Hand
Mostly, a gaffe is just truth slipping out
Two lines below of a famous hymn that would be incomprehensible to
Leftists today ("honor"? "right"? "freedom?" Freedom to agree with them
is the only freedom they believe in)
First to fight for right and freedom,
And to keep our honor clean
It is of course the hymn of the USMC -- still today the relentless warriors that they always were.
It seems a pity that the wisdom of the ancient Greek philosopher
Epictetus is now little known. Remember, wrote the Stoic thinker, "that
foul words or blows in themselves are no outrage, but your judgment
that they are so. So when any one makes you angry, know that it is your
own thought that has angered you. Wherefore make it your endeavour not
to let your impressions carry you away."
"Since therefore the knowledge and survey of vice is in this world so
necessary to the constituting of human virtue, and the scanning of error
to the confirmation of truth, how can we more safely, and with less
danger, scout into the regions of sin and falsity than by reading all
manner of tractates, and hearing all manner of reason?" -- English poet
John Milton (1608-1674) in Areopagitica
Hate speech is verbal communication that induces anger due to the listener's inability to offer an intelligent response
Leftists can try to get you fired from your job over something that you
said and that's not an attack on free speech. But if you just criticize
something that they say, then that IS an attack on free speech
"Negro" is a forbidden word -- unless a Democrat uses it
"It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood." -- Karl Popper
Why are Leftists always talking about hate? Because it fills their own hearts
Leftists don't have principles. How can they when "there is no such
thing as right and wrong"? All they have is postures, pretend-principles
that can be changed as easily as one changes one's shirt
When you have an argument with a Leftist, you are not really discussing
the facts. You are threatening his self esteem. Which is why the normal
Leftist response to challenge is mere abuse.
The
naive scholar who searches for a consistent Leftist program will not
find it. What there is consists only in the negation of the present.
The intellectual Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius (AD 121-180) could have
been speaking of much that goes on today when he said: "The object in
life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding
oneself in the ranks of the insane."
I despair of the ADL. Jews have
enough problems already and yet in the ADL one has a prominent Jewish
organization that does its best to make itself offensive to Christians.
Their Leftism is more important to them than the welfare of Jewry --
which is the exact opposite of what they ostensibly stand for! Jewish
cleverness seems to vanish when politics are involved. Fortunately,
Christians are true to their saviour and have loving hearts. Jewish
dissatisfaction with the myopia of the ADL is outlined here. Note that Foxy was too grand to reply to it.
Email me here (Hotmail address).
Index page for this site
DETAILS OF REGULARLY UPDATED BLOGS BY JOHN RAY:
"Tongue Tied"
"Dissecting Leftism" (Backup here)
"Australian Politics"
"Education Watch International"
"Political Correctness Watch"
"Greenie Watch"
GUN WATCH is now mainly put together by Dean Weingarten.
BLOGS OCCASIONALLY UPDATED:
Coral Reef Compendium
"Marx & Engels in their own words"
"A scripture blog"
"Recipes"
"Some memoirs"
Paralipomena 3
To be continued ....
Queensland Police -- A barrel with lots of bad apples
Australian Police News
Of Interest
BLOGS NO LONGER BEING UPDATED
"Immigration Watch International" blog
"Food & Health Skeptic"
"Eye on Britain"
"Paralipomena" 2
"Leftists as Elitists"
Socialized Medicine
Western Heart
OF INTEREST (2)
QANTAS -- A dying octopus
BRIAN LEITER (Ladderman)
Obama Watch
Obama Watch (2)
Dissecting Leftism -- Large font site
Michael Darby
AGL -- A bumbling monster
Telstra/Bigpond follies
Optus bungling
Vodafrauds (vodafone)
Bank of Queensland blues
There are also two blogspot blogs which record what I think are my main recent articles here and here. Similar content can be more conveniently accessed via my subject-indexed list of short articles here or here (I rarely write long articles these days)
Main academic menu
Menu of recent writings
basic home page
Pictorial Home Page
Selected pictures from blogs (Backup here)
Another picture page (Best with broadband. Rarely updated)
Note: If the link to one of my articles is not working, the
article concerned can generally be viewed by prefixing to the filename
the following:
http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/42197/20121106-1520/jonjayray.comuv.com/